Saratoga.com logo
Saratoga.com logo
  • Places to Stay
  • Things To Do
  • Food & Drink
  • Events
  • Businesses
  • Travel Guides
Saratoga Business Journal
  • Home
  • New Businesses
  • Business News
  • Business Reports
  • Business Briefs
  • Business Registrations
  • Personnel Briefs
  • Contact Us
Home  »  Business Reports  »  Business Report: Which Structure Fits Your Project Best?
Business Reports

Business Report: Which Structure Fits Your Project Best?

Posted onMay 3, 2018May 4, 2018
Sarah Lewis Belcher is senior counsel with Bond, Schoeneck & King. Courtesy Bond, Schoeneck & King

By Sarah Lewis Belcher, Esq.

Property owners have a number of options for structuring a construction project: general contractor, construction manager or design/build. There are differences among the three that are important to understand when deciding which structure best fits.

A general contractor (GC) enters into contracts with and coordinates the work of subcontractors to complete the project. General contractors are not involved in the design of the project and instead become part of the process once the plans and specifications have been completed. 

General contractors are often selected by competitive bidding, so are incentivized to keep the bid price low to be more competitive. Once the project is awarded, the GC will endeavor to keep the cost within budget, particularly since the GC will retain any unexpended amounts up to the contract price as profit.

Since GCs are not involved in project design, however, once they start work they may discover that changes are needed. This may result in delays and/or price increases. Also, because the GC’s price isn’t known until the bidding process is finished, determination of the entire project cost must wait until the GC contract is awarded.

A construction manager (CM) manages almost all phases of construction, starting with the design. The CM’s responsibilities generally include evaluating the construction program, providing a project schedule, cost estimates and scopes of work for the various contractors, advising the owner and architect on site use, selections of materials, building systems and equipment, and providing recommendations on labor availability, procurement timing, installation and construction, costs of alternate designs and possible cost savings. 

Construction managers are usually chosen based on qualifications and experience rather than through bidding. CM fees are generally a flat, percentage or hourly rates.

 There are two types of CM agreements, one in which the CM is an advisor and the other in which the CM is a constructor. In the advisor structure, the owner will enter into contracts directly with the various contractors. 

As a result, the owner would be responsible for bringing litigation if a contractor failed to perform and also runs the risk of being sued for alleged owner defaults under the contract(s). If the CM is the constructor, the CM enters into the contracts and, similar to the GC arrangement, the CM must then enforce and is the obligor under the contracts. 

The compensation and payment arrangement for the constructor structure are generally broken down into pre-construction services, cost of work and construction services. 

Although the contract with the CM as constructor separately delineates the responsibilities for the pre-construction and construction phases, work for these phases may occur concurrently to speed the project along.

Due to the nature of the GC arrangement, the interests of a GC aren’t necessarily aligned with those of the owner. A GC must make assumptions and decisions about its margins and risk when it prepares its bid package. To the extent the reality differs from the information used to prepare the bid, changes may be required in the plans and specifications, which could lead to delays and/or increased prices the owner didn’t anticipate. 

Also, as noted previously, once a project is awarded it is in the GC’s best interest to complete the project under budget so that its profit is increased. The owner may be adversely impacted to the extent quality could be compromised because of the GC’s efforts to keep costs down, or the project price may increase during construction, necessitating budget and financing revisions.

The CM arrangement has been described as one where the CM and owner are “on the same side.” 

They work together starting in the pre-construction phase to design the most cost effective project, budget and schedule to achieve the owner’s objectives. Because the CM is involved in early planning it may be able to provide more realistic schedules and cost estimates than a GC who is reviewing plans and specifications concerning which it had no input. 

The CM as constructor arrangement eliminates the risks associated with the owner entering into construction contracts that are inherent in the CM as advisor structure, but the CM’s fees are typically higher in the constructor scenario as a result of the increased risk.

Design/build is another option. With this structure, the GC enters into contracts not only for the construction, but also for the design of the project. As a result, the owner has one contact for the entire project and the GC is responsible for all aspects of the project. 

This arrangement can require less of the owner’s time and attention than a GC or CM structure. If the owner wants to be involved in the details of the project and/or have more than one party involved in the project answerable to the owner, either the GC or CM structure may be a better fit. 

Belcher is senior counsel with Bond, Schoeneck & King, representing developers, lenders, purchasers, sellers, landlords and tenants in a wide variety of commercial real estate and lending matters.

Previous Article U.S. Military Academy Grad Builds Career As A Trainer, Motivational Speaker And Writer
Next Article Business Report: Want To Grow? Reinvest In Your Staff
Subscribe to Our Newsletter
View the Latest Virtual Edition

Categories

  • 50-Plus
  • Banking
  • Banking / Asset Managment
  • Building Trades
  • Business Briefs
  • Business News
  • Business Registrations
  • Business Reports
  • Commercial / Residential Real Estate
  • Community Services
  • Construction
  • Construction Planning
  • Corporate Tax / Business Planning
  • Cyber / Tech
  • Dining Guide
  • Economic Development
  • Economic Outlook 2016
  • Economic Outlook 2017
  • Economic Outlook 2018
  • Economic Outlook 2019
  • Economic Outlook 2020
  • Education/ Training/ Personal Development
  • Entrepreneurial Women
  • Entrepreneurship
  • Environment / Development
  • Financial Planning / Investments
  • Fitness / Nutrition
  • Health / Community Services
  • Health & Fitness
  • Health & Wellness
  • Healthcare
  • Holiday Guide
  • Holiday Shopping
  • Home / Energy
  • Home / Insurance
  • Home & Real Esate
  • Insurance / Employee Benefits
  • Insurance / Medical Services
  • Legal / Accounting
  • Meet The Chef
  • New Businesses
  • Non-Profit
  • Office / Computer / New Media
  • Office / HR / Employment
  • Office/ Technology/ E-Commerce
  • Outlook 2021
  • Personnel Briefs
  • Retirement Planning
  • Senior Living / Retirement
  • Summer Construction
  • Uncategorized
  • Wellness
  • Women In Business
  • Workplace / Security / Legal
  • Year-End Tax Planning

Archives

  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
Connect With Us

Follow, like and subscribe to Saratoga.com on social media

Account Sign In Submit An Event
Saratoga.com logo
  • Home
  • Places To Stay
  • Things To Do
  • Food & Drink
  • Events
  • Real Estate
  • Businesses
  • Guides
  • Contact Us
  • Blogs
  • Sweepstakes
  • Advertising
Visit Saratoga.com For Everything Saratoga
Full-Service Internet Marketing: Search Engine Optimization, Website Design and Development by Mannix Marketing, Inc.
Mannix Marketing, Inc. is headquartered near Saratoga Springs in Glens Falls, New York
Saratoga.com All Rights Reserved © 2021
Disclaimer & Privacy Policy / Terms of Use / Copyright Policies

We strive to insure accuracy on Saratoga.com however accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Information is subject to change.
Please alert us if there is any inaccurate information here.

Having trouble using this site? Accessibility is our goal, please contact or email us with site improvements.